Dirty money? The Society's investments
The Merchants run a company called SMV Investments that
owns properties and trades shares. Most of the people we identify
in the Society's inner circle are directors of the firm.
SMV Investments - worth just over £7 million - is an
unlimited company, meaning that it does not have to file accounts
or an annual report at Companies House (www.companies-house.gov.uk),
the official register or UK companies. However, it did send
Companies House an annual report in March 2001, which contains
detailed information about the financial year that ended on
10 November 2000. Although it is now two and a half years
old, it is the most up-to-date information about the firm
on public record. Parkes claims that SMV no longer files accounts
with Companies House because it isn't run as a company any
more.
In 2001, SMV Investments had £564,000 invested in property.
It included land behind properties on Redland Road, a building
in Kingsholme Road in Southmead, land between York Place and
Richmond Terrace in Clifton, properties at 146 and 150 Whiteladies
Road, and the Artillery Ground, home to the Territorial Army,
also on Whiteladies.
But it is believed the Society's holdings stretch far beyond
Bristol. At the beginning of 2002, its agricultural portfolio
consisted of 21,323 acres. The Society controls farms as far
away as Basingstoke, a nursery, a canal longboat marina and
a gravelpit in Buckinghamshire. Part of its huge Croome Estate
at Defford near Worcester is home to a government surveillance
and communications station.
According to its 2001 accounts, SMV also had £6.7 million
invested in 33 companies. As you'd expect, most of the shares
are in investment trusts, banks and major firms. But SMV had
money with some firms engaged in what many would call highly
questionable activities. It had:
* £41,000 with BAe Systems (www.baesystems.co.uk).
Now the world's biggest arms producer, BAe Systems makes submarines,
warships, warplanes and missiles. It has sold arms to some
of the most repressive regimes in the world, including Indonesia
and Saudi Arabia.
* £203,000 in Marconi(www.marconi.com),
a communications firm, part owned by BAe, also heavily involved
in military contracts.
* £126,000 with British American Tobacco, (www.bat.com)
the UK's largest tobacco company (and a major rival to Bristol-based
Imperial Tobacco). In 2000, BAT was accused of smuggling,
racketeering and tax evasion. It is currently under investigation
by the Department For Trade And Industry for alleged smuggling.
* £423,000 with Astrazeneca (www.astrazeneca.co.uk),
long criticised for its huge investments in GM technology.
In 2000 they were exposed for secretly developing so-called
GM terminator technology, which aid agencies and charities
believe will allow multi-nationals to hold Third World farmers
to ransom.
* £78,000 in Glaxo Wellcome (now called GlaxoSmithKline
www.gsk.com), seriously criticised
for allegedly putting its profits before the rights of HIV
victims in the developing world to get affordable treatment.
* £901,000 in the petrol company Shell (www.shell.com),
accused of serious human rights violations in Nigeria. November
10, the day the Merchants' go to church and sign off SMV's
accounts, marks the most shameful episodes in Shell's history:
the hanging in 1995 of the Nigerian environmentalist and community
leader Ken Saro-Wiwa. He was hanged after a show trial along
with eight other community activists who opposed Shell's presence
in Ogoniland. Shell is implicated in their arrest and trial;
the firm has also admitted paying field allowances and providing
logistical support to the brutal Nigerian military in Ogoniland.
Ken's brother, Owens Wiwa, says: "It is our firm belief
that Shell's role in the hanging of Ken and the other eight
Ogoni was to enable investors to get more profit. It is imperative
for such investors to be made aware of the human and environmental
waste that is traded off for their profit, and also to insist
that the investors divest from corporations like Shell. This
is the only moral and legitimate step to take, in order to
stop the murders and destruction that go on in the developing
world in the name of development."
But the Merchants are unmoved by these criticisms. "If
it's the will of the donor that the funds are invested ethically,
then we will do so," says Parkes. "But the trustees
have a duty to act in the best interest of this trust - it
is not an ethical fund." He said the organisation "knows
nothing at all" about the activities of Shell in Nigeria
- even though it was front-page news at the time.
Parkes claims that income from SMV is now used "for the
Society to pay its way, to pay staff and run the Merchants
Hall" - SMV's accounts show that, at least historically,
payments were made by SMV investments to several charities.
So profits from the Shell shares were funding Bristol charities.
|